Home› At-Tawbah› Ayah 7
Surah At-Tawbah  ·  Ayah 7  ·  سورة التوبة
كَيْفَ يَكُونُ لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ عَهْدٌ عِندَ اللَّهِ وَعِندَ رَسُولِهِ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ فَمَا اسْتَقَامُوا لَكُمْ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ
Kayfa yakūnu lil-mushrikīna 'ahdun 'indallāhi wa 'inda rasūlihi illalladhīna 'āhadtum 'indal masjidil harāmi famastaqāmū lakum fastaqīmū lahum innallāha yuhibbul muttaqīn.
"How can there be a covenant with Allah and His Messenger for the polytheists, except those with whom you made a treaty at the Sacred Mosque? So as long as they remain upright toward you, remain upright toward them. Indeed Allah loves the God-fearing."
Layer One
The Text النص
▼

Arabic

كَيْفَ يَكُونُ لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ عَهْدٌ عِندَ اللَّهِ وَعِندَ رَسُولِهِ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ فَمَا اسْتَقَامُوا لَكُمْ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ

Transliteration

Kayfa yakūnu lil-mushrikīna 'ahdun 'indallāhi wa 'inda rasūlihi illalladhīna 'āhadtum 'indal masjidil harāmi famastaqāmū lakum fastaqīmū lahum innallāha yuhibbul muttaqīn.

Full Translation

"How can there be a covenant with Allah and His Messenger for the polytheists, except those with whom you made a treaty at the Sacred Mosque? So as long as they remain upright toward you, remain upright toward them. Indeed Allah loves the God-fearing."

Layer Two
Word by Word كلمة بكلمة
▼
ArabicTransliterationMeaning
كَيْفَkayfahow — استفهام إنكاري, rhetorical denial
يَكُونُyakūnucan there be — كان in مضارع, timeless
لِلْمُشْرِكِينَlil-mushrikīnfor the polytheists — خبر يكون, fronted
عَهْدٌ'ahduna covenant — اسم يكون, مرفوع
عِندَ اللَّهِ'indallāhwith Allah — ظرف مكان
وَعِندَ رَسُولِهِwa 'inda rasūlihand with His Messenger
إِلَّا الَّذِينَillalladhīnaexcept those who — استثناء
عَاهَدتُّمْ'āhadtumyou made a covenant with — Form III mutual, root ع-ه-د
عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ'indal masjidil harāmat the Sacred Mosque
فَمَا اسْتَقَامُواfamastaqāmūso as long as they remain upright — Form X, root ق-و-م
لَكُمْlakumtoward you
فَاسْتَقِيمُواfastaqīmūthen remain upright — Form X imperative
لَهُمْlahumtoward them
إِنَّ اللَّهَinnallāhindeed Allah — إِنَّ for emphasis
يُحِبُّyuhibbuloves — Form I مضارع, continuous divine action
الْمُتَّقِينَal-muttaqīnthe God-fearing — Form VIII اسم الفاعل, root و-ق-ي
Layer Three
Historical Context سبب النزول
▼

The Political Situation — 9AH

After the conquest of Makkah in 8AH, various tribes had different treaty arrangements with the Muslims. Some had honored their treaties completely. Others had broken them — actively helping the enemies of the Muslims while officially being at peace.

This ayah arrives as part of the general declaration of treaty dissolution — but with a critical, surgical exception. The opening ayaat of Surah Tawbah declared that treaties with those who broke them are dissolved. But this ayah names those who did not break their word.

The Tribes at the Sacred Mosque

Scholars — including Ibn Kathir رحمه الله — identify the Banu Kinanah and specifically the Banu Mudlij as the tribes referenced in الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ. These tribes had a treaty with the Muslims and had honored it without violation. Their covenant stands because they stood by theirs.

The Quran as State Document

This is the Quran functioning as a legal document — distinguishing between treaty-breakers and treaty-keepers with surgical precision, in the middle of a general declaration of war. The divine revelation is doing the work of a supreme court — issuing rulings that are simultaneously theological and political, permanent and specific.

Layer Four
Grammar & Structure النحو والصرف
▼

كَيْفَ يَكُونُ — Rhetorical Question + كان in مضارع

كَيْفَ = استفهام إنكاري — not a genuine question but a rhetorical declaration of impossibility. The meaning: there cannot be.

يَكُونُ = كان in مضارع form. This is critical. كان in ماضي would make the ruling historical — there was no covenant. But يَكُونُ in مضارع carries استمرار — continuity across all times. The ruling is not just for 9AH Arabia. It is a permanent principle: how can there ever be a covenant that stands for those who dishonor it?

التقديم والتأخير — لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ Fronted

The normal order would be: كَيْفَ يَكُونُ عَهْدٌ لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ — how can there be a covenant for the polytheists.

But Allah fronts لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ before عَهْدٌ. This is تقديم وتأخير — inversion for emphasis. The focus falls on for the polytheists — the very category is what is being questioned. The emphasis is not on the covenant — it is on who it would be for.

Grammatically: لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ = خبر يكون (fronted). عَهْدٌ = اسم يكون (مرفوع).

عَاهَدتُّمْ — Form III Mutual Action

Root: ع-ه-د. Alif after first root letter → Form III (فَاعَلَ) = mutual action between two parties.

Form I عَهِدَ = he made a pledge. Form III عَاهَدَ = he made a covenant with someone — mutually, reciprocally. A covenant requires two sides. The alif in Form III stretches between them.

اسْتَقَامُوا / اسْتَقِيمُوا — Form X Mirror

Root: ق-و-م. Form X (اسْتَفْعَلَ) = to seek uprightness — to actively maintain being straight.

إعلال: اسْتَقْوَمَ → the و transforms to ا → اسْتَقَامَ. Same root as الصراط المستقيم.

اسْتَقَامُوا = ماضي, third person plural — their past action described.
اسْتَقِيمُوا = أمر, second person plural — command to the Muslims.

Same root. Same form. Different mood. Their steadfastness triggers your steadfastness. Action meets equal action. The mirroring is intentional and beautiful.

إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ — The Theological Conclusion

إِنَّ = for emphasis and confirmation. اسم إِنَّ = اللَّهَ (منصوب). خبر إِنَّ = يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ (جملة فعلية, مرفوع position).

يُحِبُّ in مضارع = continuous, ongoing divine love. Not He loved — He loves. Always. Perpetually.

الْمُتَّقِينَ = Form VIII اسم الفاعل from root و-ق-ي — to protect, to guard. المتقي = one who places a guard between himself and Allah's displeasure. Taqwa is active protection, not passive fear.

Layer Five
The Meaning Layer المعنى العميق
▼

The Exception Within the Declaration

The general declaration at the opening of Surah Tawbah was severe — dissolve the treaties of those who broke them. But even within that severity, this ayah carves out a protected space: إِلَّا الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ.

Their treaty stands. Because they stood by theirs. The principle is not religious — it is about honor. A non-Muslim who keeps his word has more claim to a standing covenant than a Muslim who breaks his.

This is one of the clearest demonstrations that Islamic governance is built on demonstrated behavior not religious identity.

The Mutual Principle — فَمَا اسْتَقَامُوا فَاسْتَقِيمُوا

The condition is beautiful in its simplicity. As long as they are upright toward you — you are upright toward them. The moment they break — the covenant breaks. But not before.

This became the foundation of فقه المعاهدات — the jurisprudence of international treaties in Islamic law. Covenants are valid and must be honored as long as the other party honors them. This is not weakness. It is principle.

The same root — اسْتَقَامَ — describing both sides creates a moral mirror. The Muslim's uprightness is a reflection of the other's. Equal. Conditional. Principled.

Why Taqwa Concludes a Political Ruling

Allah ends this political, legal ruling about treaties with إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ — He loves the God-fearing.

Because the law alone cannot produce uprightness. You can honor a treaty out of fear, out of strategic calculation, out of political interest. But only تقوى makes you honor it when no one is watching — when breaking it would benefit you — when the other party would never find out.

Taqwa is the internal engine that makes external compliance real and lasting. And the reward for that internal engine is not political stability or strategic advantage. It is يُحِبُّ — the love of Allah. The real prize.

Layer Six
In Our Time — 2026 في زماننا
▼

Contracts, Trust, and the Crisis of Institutions

In 2026, trust in institutions — governments, corporations, international bodies — is at historic lows globally. The reason is almost always the same: commitments made publicly are not honored privately. Agreements signed are not implemented genuinely.

This ayah establishes the clearest possible framework: فَمَا اسْتَقَامُوا لَكُمْ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا لَهُمْ. Uprightness is mutual and conditional. The moment one party exits it, the covenant loses its moral standing. But until that moment — honor it completely. This principle, if applied to international relations, trade agreements, and institutional commitments in 2026, would transform how we structure accountability.

يَكُونُ — The Timeless مضارع and Universal Principles

The choice of مضارع rather than ماضي makes this ayah not a historical ruling but a permanent constitutional principle. How can there ever be a standing covenant with those who demonstrably dishonor every commitment they make?

In 2026 — apply this to business partnerships, political alliances, platform relationships. The test is not what someone says about their values. The test is اسْتَقَامُوا — did they remain upright? Over time. Under pressure. When it cost them something.

Taqwa as Business Culture

The ayah ends with تقوى — God-consciousness — as the reason to honor your commitments even when breaking them would be advantageous. In 2026, the equivalent question for any business or leader is: what is your internal engine for honoring commitments when no one is watching?

Organizations without that internal engine — without their equivalent of تقوى — produce exactly what the preceding ayaat described: manufactured satisfaction, private refusal, and eventual betrayal. The law, the contract, the regulation — none of these are sufficient substitutes for a genuine internal commitment to uprightness.

Allah's love — يُحِبُّ — is the real return on integrity. Everything else is a by-product.

Layer Seven
Student Discussion نقاش الطالب
▼

Questions to Sit With

The exception — الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ — shows that honor, not religious identity, is the basis for standing covenants. What does this say about how we should evaluate people and institutions — by what they say they believe or by what they demonstrably do?
فَمَا اسْتَقَامُوا لَكُمْ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا لَهُمْ — uprightness is mutual and conditional. Where is the line between principled reciprocity and reactive retaliation? How do you know when the covenant has genuinely been broken?
Allah ends a political ruling with إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ الْمُتَّقِينَ. What is the relationship between taqwa and professional integrity in your own field? Can you have one without the other?

Share Your Reflection

What does this ayah open up for you? Send it to us.

✉ Share via Email

Submissions reviewed before publishing.

Layer Eight
Scholar Contributions إضافات العلماء
▼
Ibn Kathir رحمه الله — Tafsir Ibn Kathir
On the exception — إِلَّا الَّذِينَ عَاهَدتُّمْ عِندَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ: scholars identify the Banu Kinanah and Banu Mudlij specifically. They had not violated their treaty and had not aided the enemies of the Muslims. Allah commands that their covenant be honored completely until its term expires — and that the Muslims remain as upright toward them as they have been toward the Muslims.
Imam Ash-Shafi'i رحمه الله — Al-Risalah and Usul al-Fiqh
This ayah was used by Imam Ash-Shafi'i and subsequent jurists as a foundational principle in the jurisprudence of treaties — that covenants with non-Muslims are valid, binding, and must be honored as long as the other party honors them. The basis for the covenant is demonstrated conduct, not religious identity.

Contribute a Scholarly Perspective

Do you have a citation from classical tafsir or an insight from your own study to add?

Submit a Contribution